Editorial Policy

MahDigit publishes AI workflow guides, tool reviews, comparisons, and browser-based utilities for readers who want practical recommendations. This page explains how we create, review, and maintain that work.

1. Editorial mission

Our goal is to help readers decide what to use, what to ignore, and how to adopt AI without adding unnecessary complexity. We prioritize clarity, useful trade-offs, and first-hand validation over hype or volume.

2. Authorship and accountability

• Every article is published under a named author.
• Author pages explain each contributor's role and coverage area.
• When a page has been independently checked, we display reviewer metadata on the article.

3. How we build articles

• We choose topics based on reader usefulness, not just search volume.
• We may use AI to help with outlining, restructuring, or draft cleanup.
• Final wording, factual claims, and publication decisions are reviewed by a human editor.
• We do not publish raw AI output as finished editorial work.

4. Evidence standards

• Review and comparison pages should include methodology notes whenever practical.
• Time-sensitive claims such as pricing, limits, model access, and feature availability are checked against primary vendor sources before publication or major updates.
• We include limitations, mismatches, and failure cases instead of presenting every tool as a winner.

5. Corrections and updates

We update pages when material information changes or when we identify an error. For tool reviews and evergreen tutorials, we use update timestamps and verification notes to show when a page was last checked.

6. Monetization and independence

MahDigit may earn revenue from advertising and affiliate links. Monetization does not determine rankings or conclusions. We do not sell guaranteed positive coverage.

7. Reader feedback

If you believe a page is outdated, unclear, or inaccurate, contact us through the Contact page. We review correction requests and update material issues when confirmed.